This paper introduces two models, the basic model and the peer review model, for evaluating the quality of collaboratively edited articles (such as those on Wikipedia) and the authority of their contributors. By representing articles and contributors within a bipartite graph, the basic model assesses article quality based on contributor authority and contribution amount, while the peer review model additionally incorporates the review process of article content. Experiments conducted on Wikipedia pages validate the effectiveness of these models in leveraging the collaborative dynamics of online communities to measure article quality and contributor authority.
-
Lim, Ee-Peng, et al. "Measuring qualities of articles contributed by online communities." 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI 2006 Main Conference Proceedings)(WI'06). IEEE, 2006.
-
Members
- Chris Anderson
- JoelR
- JoeyM
- envy
- Adriano Faria
- Square Wheels
- Nathan Explosion
- Dilip
- DawPi
- V0RT3X
- ali hagi
- lukash
- TracyIsland
- opentype
- StevenM
- Como
- Marcin Martyniak
- IC Essentials
- Andhrafriends Admin
- adik
- N700
- MissB
- XwReK
- terabyte
- GazzaGarratt
- A Zayed
- PrettyPixels
- Paul
- onlyME
- isvans
- Claudia999
- rainx
- NewVicious
- Daffy
- hyprem
- GuitarGathering
- Tripp
- Kirill Gromov
- Askancy
- MLK
- aXenDev
- Live Games
- Jelly Belly
- eveneme eveneme
- Analog
- Synergy
- burnyourfeelings
- Nomad
- ReyDev
- Morphe
- eivindsimensen
- YourSharona
- lordi
- shahed
- John Horton
- PayMap
- Serval
- Matt
- Nomer3
- Dennis Maidon
- Nicolas PC
- Ioannis D
- bernhara
- Zennuie
- COSMIN
- wulfx01
- Matthew Hawley
- bing11
- Verto
- George Anderssen
- Toby
- Cheryl
- ArashDev
- abobader
- IPS THEME
- SzymonPajacyk
- Bearback
- nosavinggrace
- Aengul
- Labis
- Maxius
- Shawn RR
- Richard Arch
- Marius
- Gary
- Sofia
- Ryan
- JoshB
- John Morris
- Mila
- Montreal
- aLEX49566
- PPlanet
- Ronald
- Fabian Paul Sanabria
- Meddysong
- sulervo
- PasXal
- ozman
- ZLTRGO